Papers: Stansted residents oppose speculative housing applications

This week’s papers cover the formation of the Save Stansted Village residents group that opposes unsustainable and predatory development in Stansted Mountfitchet. They have formed to fight a barrage of speculative development applications.

Under the Uttlesford Local Plan, Stansted was only scheduled to get 60 new homes because they have seen approvals for 700 new homes since 2001 – a 33% growth. However Uttlesford District Council (UDC) seems to be increasingly losing control over planning because it is behind with meeting its required supply of applications for 415 new homes per year.  Because of this, recently the planning inspector found against the council and for the developer in a Dunmow development appeal.

That means that emboldened developers are lobbing in building applications right, left and centre. So in the last month speculative applications have come in for an additional 428 new homes in Stansted, even though UDC only wants to build 60 over the next 15 years.

The applications are:

From the Saffron Walden Weekly News:

Residents in Stansted Mountfitchet have set up the Save Stansted Village group to oppose “unsustainable housing developments” – mirroring similar groups in Henham and Elsenham, Newport and Saffron Walden.

Ray Woodcock, spokesman for the group, said: “We are all Stansted Mountfitchet villagers at the moment but we want others to join us from Bishop’s Stortford, Henham, Elsenham and everywhere.

The Saffron Walden Reporter also covers the story:

Gail Hogg, of Bentfield Green, a founding member of Save Stansted Village, “As residents we feel we have to try to do everything we possibly can to protect what we value and love around us.”

Stansted Parish Council is against the idea of building homes in that area of the village. Chairman Geoffrey Sell told the Reporter: “We are not against development but it has got to be in the right location. Bentfield is the wrong location; in our submissions to the Local Development Framework we ruled it out…..the infrastructure is already at crisis point.”

Read articles in the Walden Weekly (page 14), Walden Reporter (page 4), Herts and Essex Observer (website: residents’ group article) and Herts and Essex Observer (website: Walpole Farm article).

Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Papers, Planning, Uttlesford District Council, Uttlesford Local Plan
3 comments on “Papers: Stansted residents oppose speculative housing applications
  1. the only thing I would say is that these quotes do not come from the group’s spokesperson and whilst everyone is concerned about the rush to put in applications all over stansted but else where in the area too, the Save Stansted Village group is specfically focused on the Taylor Wimpey application.
    it is however of course a very disturbing time for everyone in Uttlesford while we do not have a formalised Development Plan and residents are feeling very vulnerable as a result with no protection it would seem.

  2. Janet harris says:

    And the Reporter of last week. We need to join with Bishops Stortford too, as Faifield will putting in for planning in the not to distant future and with Stortford a hop and skip from Hellsenham . The towns and villages around here will be sucked up , as the villages that make up Harlow Town, and Milto Keynes have been over time!

  3. I am a great supporter of Save Stansted Village and the Parish Council is doing all we can to support them. We have posted information about proposed developments on our website stansted.net. Some good letters in this weeks press from SSV and Messrs. Bowman and Gadd.

Comments are closed.

Is where you live on the map?
Feature: Local Plan Sites

Read more...

Sign up for our email updates, follow us on your favourite sites or help us out:

Subscribe to email updates Follow on Facebook Follow on Twitter Volunteer to help us

Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

%d bloggers like this: